书
…all advocate for certain forms of erasure over memory precisely because memorialization has a tendency to tidy up disorderly histories (of slavery, the Holocaust, wars, etc.). Memory is itself a disciplinary mechanism that Foucault calls “a ritual of power”; it selects for what is important (the histories of triumph), it reads a continuous narrative into one full of ruptures and contradictions, and it sets precedents for other
“memorializations.”
书
It may well be that the reflexes that put in play similarity and dissimilarity, analogy, and contrast are fundamental to the human psyche and to the possibility of the intelligible.
书
Our recursion, upstream, to the sources of saying is, almost always, partial.